Forced evictions & market demolitions during COVID-19

Market demolitions

Under COVID-19 we have seen forced evictions and demolitions of dwellings and of small businesses. In some cases, COVID-19 and the need for social distancing is the justification, but in others, demolition continues despite COVID-19.

When it comes to demolition of dwellings, we’ve seen plans to demolish marginalized communities around the world continuing during COVID, even though this clearly comes in contradiction with shelter-at-home orders. How are people to stay home, when the state destroys their home? We’ve seen this happen in places like Kenya,  South Africa, the occupied Palestinian territory, and the Philippines. Not surprisingly, these demolitions have caused an increase in COVID-19 infection. 

At the start of the pandemic, an estimated 1.8 billion people worldwide were homeless or living in inadequate housing, subject to overcrowding and a lack of access to water and sanitation which left them more vulnerable to contracting the virus. Global public-health measures to keep people indoors and avoid contact outside households goes against indigenous and occupied peoples need for land as a matter of survival and food sovereignty. These groups are increasingly vulnerable to loss of homes, threatening lives and livelihood due to measures taken to curb the pandemic. For example, loss of livelihood, suspension of democratic controls and use of violence against environmental and human rights defenders, and the closing of land administration services due to lockdown measures. These effects have led to increased risks of irregular land acquisition, resource grabbing, and loss of assets and land access.

Zoning and building regulations have always been a tool used by governments to control growth and the spread of urban communities and populations. While zoning laws themselves are needed and are part of organizing urban and rural space, they are often misused to restrict certain populations—mostly the marginalized and the poor. Demolitions of dwellings of migrant communities and refugee camps have also been a reoccurring method used by governments around the world to deter migration.

In addition to the demolition of residential dwellings, withholding trading permits and destroying  markets, stalls, and other less formal vending structures is a form of economic control states exercise over their citizens.  Worldwide we’ve seen malls taking the place of markets and storefronts replacing street vendors. Alongside the advantages of regulating more formal business, this approach pushes aside small, usually family-run working-class businesses. 

Across the globe, governments have closed down marketplaces to enforce social distancing. In Kenya some markets were not only shut down, but demolished. In Harare, the capital of Zimbabwe, informal trader stalls were also demolished, and cases in which police plunder and attack stalls have increased. In Israel and other places, malls have been reopened while open markets, which theoretically pose less of a health threat as they are in open space, remain closed. The demolition (rather than just closing) of markets, and the reopening of some businesses and not others seems to have deliberately  hit the working class hardest. COVID-19 has helped governments promote formal trading from which they can more easily receive taxes, while not only destroying many livelihoods, but also removing cheaper food sources. 

Our recommendations

  1. The United Nations should issue an official statement urging all states to suspend home demolitions during the pandemic. The UN has already made statements against demolition of Palestinian homes under COVID as well as in Kenya.
  2. Unions and other associations of market vendors and traders have seen success in negotiating with governments to avoid closures or destruction of markets, finding solutions including identifying alternatives venues. Civil society and others should do all they can to support these negotiations.
  3. At the bare minimum, governments must provide temporary and emergency accommodation to everyone without adequate housing to enable social distancing and shelter-at-home orders.
  4. Support LANDac and LANDdialogue by filling in this survey to help map the current challenges and opportunities for effective and fair land governance, and to understand the impacts of the pandemic on land rights.

COVID Report: Year One

One year into the COVID-19 pandemic, restrictions on civil space are increasing. Recognizing the need to protect public health, our report looks at nine kinds of restrictions that could limit civil space for the long term and how civil society can respond.

Regions currently impacted

Get in Touch

Under the Mask is an evolving project dedicated to the alarming increase in restrictions on civic space around the world, worsening during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how individuals and organizations are responding to protect that space. We welcome your feedback about this website, and we invite you to participate in this collective effort.